Editorial Policy
How PassportFactory researches, reviews, and corrects content
This page explains how we approach sourcing, updates, AI-assisted workflows, corrections, and editorial independence.
1. Scope
PassportFactory publishes independent informational content about passport strength, visa access, travel-document rules, and related traveler planning tools. We are not a government authority, legal representative, or application-processing service.
2. Sourcing and verification
We prioritize official government, consular, or primary-source materials whenever possible. If secondary reporting is used for context, it should support rather than replace the primary source. When official pages conflict or remain unclear, we note that conflict instead of presenting unsupported certainty.
3. Updates and freshness
Pages are reviewed when we detect changes to visa policy, documentation rules, fees, validity windows, or mobility rankings that could affect user decisions. Date-sensitive content should include verification context where practical.
4. AI-assisted workflows
We use AI-assisted internal workflows to organize research, draft working copy, and identify update candidates. Public-facing content is reviewed and approved by the PassportFactory team before publication. AI output is not treated as a source.
5. Corrections
If you believe a page contains an error, email us with the page URL, the exact claim in question, and the best source for review. We investigate correction requests and update published pages when the evidence supports a change.
6. Revenue and independence
Advertising, partnerships, and analytics do not control editorial conclusions. Revenue relationships should not change how we describe policy requirements, timelines, or official eligibility rules.
Related pages
For more detail on where our information comes from and how to reach the team, review the pages below.